Kubiack v. Clement

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kubiack v. Clement

54 N.Y.S. 773

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 N.Y.S. 773 (Kubiack v. Clement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kubiack v. Clement, 54 N.Y.S. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDIN, P. J.

The affidavits used upon the motion show very clearly that the cause of action originated in Niagara county, and the preponderance of witnesses apparently necessary to be used upon the' trial of the issues reside in Niagara county. A motion was made for the convenience of witnesses, and it was not necessary that it should be made within the 10-day rule laid down in section 986 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In Gior v. Kelly (decided by this court Jan., 1898) 50 N. Y. Supp. 1127, it was held that, in a case evenly balanced as to witnesses, the county in which the cause of action originated was an important circumstance to be taken into account in determining the motion.' The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and the motion granted, with $10 costs to abide event.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDIN, P. J.

The affidavits used upon the motion show very clearly that the cause of action originated in Niagara county, and the preponderance of witnesses apparently necessary to be used upon the' trial of the issues reside in Niagara county. A motion was made for the convenience of witnesses, and it was not necessary that it should be made within the 10-day rule laid down in section 986 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In Gior v. Kelly (decided by this court Jan., 1898) 50 N. Y. Supp. 1127, it was held that, in a case evenly balanced as to witnesses, the county in which the cause of action originated was an important circumstance to be taken into account in determining the motion.' The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, and the motion granted, with $10 costs to abide event.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 N.Y.S. 773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kubiack-v-clement-nyappdiv-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack