Kubala v. Suddaby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kubala v. Suddaby

32 A.D.3d 1227, 820 N.Y.S.2d 838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 32 A.D.3d 1227 (Kubala v. Suddaby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kubala v. Suddaby, 32 A.D.3d 1227, 820 N.Y.S.2d 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered September 6, 2005 in a medical malpractice action. The judgment, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict of no cause of action, dismissing the complaint in this medical malpractice action. We reject the contention of plaintiffs that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. “[T]he preponderance of the evidence in favor of plaintiff[s] is not so great that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence, nor is the verdict [finding that defendant was not negligent] palpably wrong or irrational” (Kettles v City of Rochester, 21 AD3d 1424, 1425 [2005]; see generally Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered September 6, 2005 in a medical malpractice action. The judgment, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment, entered upon a jury verdict of no cause of action, dismissing the complaint in this medical malpractice action. We reject the contention of plaintiffs that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. “[T]he preponderance of the evidence in favor of plaintiff[s] is not so great that the verdict could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence, nor is the verdict [finding that defendant was not negligent] palpably wrong or irrational” (Kettles v City of Rochester, 21 AD3d 1424, 1425 [2005]; see generally Lolik v Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995]). Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.3d 1227, 820 N.Y.S.2d 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kubala-v-suddaby-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack