K.T. v. Department of Children & Families

706 So. 2d 1385, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3719
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1998·No. Nos. 97-3141, 98-705·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The factual and legal circumstances of this case as it relates to the child A.T. are essentially identical to those in Roberts v. Florida Dep’t of Children & Families, 687 So.2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Because, as in Roberts, there is neither evidence nor the finding mandated by section 39.41(1), Florida Statutes (1997), that placing the child with his natural mother “would endanger [his] safety and well-being,” we order that effective Thursday, April 16, 1998 — subsequent to a presently scheduled hearing in the court below and unless on the basis of the evidence at that hearing the trial court appropriately makes the finding required by the statute— that custody of A.T. be granted the appellant mother.

Habeas Corpus, certiorari granted.1

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

K.T. v. Department of Children & Families, 706 So. 2d 1385, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3719 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 1385 (K.T. v. Department of Children & Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WT v. Dept. of Children and Families
787 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)