K.S. Finance Corp. v. Grand Palace Hotel at the Park, L. L. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

K.S. Finance Corp. v. Grand Palace Hotel at the Park, L. L. C.

272 A.D.2d 204, 709 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5627

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 204 (K.S. Finance Corp. v. Grand Palace Hotel at the Park, L. L. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

K.S. Finance Corp. v. Grand Palace Hotel at the Park, L. L. C., 272 A.D.2d 204, 709 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5627 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered September 23, 1999, awarding plaintiff K.S. Finance Corp. the principal amount of $126,000, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered September 14, 1999, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment.

Defendant failed to rebut plaintiff’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment premised upon the subject instrument for the payment of money only. Documents submitted with the summary judgment motion indicate that plaintiff acted in good faith and paid value for the check.

The court properly rejected defendant’s claim that this action should be dismissed because of the pendency of another action, since the record does not establish a legal agency relationship between plaintiff and the named payee on the check whereby the former should be considered the “same partly]” in “another action pending” (CPLR 3211 [a] [4]). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered September 23, 1999, awarding plaintiff K.S. Finance Corp. the principal amount of $126,000, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered September 14, 1999, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the aforesaid order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the ensuing judgment.

Defendant failed to rebut plaintiff’s prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment premised upon the subject instrument for the payment of money only. Documents submitted with the summary judgment motion indicate that plaintiff acted in good faith and paid value for the check.

The court properly rejected defendant’s claim that this action should be dismissed because of the pendency of another action, since the record does not establish a legal agency relationship between plaintiff and the named payee on the check whereby the former should be considered the “same partly]” in “another action pending” (CPLR 3211 [a] [4]). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 204, 709 N.Y.S.2d 512, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ks-finance-corp-v-grand-palace-hotel-at-the-park-l-l-c-nyappdiv-2000.