Krzos v. Krzos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krzos v. Krzos

19 A.D.2d 581, 240 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3724

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 581 (Krzos v. Krzos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krzos v. Krzos, 19 A.D.2d 581, 240 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order modifying a provision in a prior interlocutory order fixing alimony pendente lite and granting defendant husband limited rights to visit the children of the marriage. On the day the appeal was argued by appellant the trial court handed down a decision following trial of the separation action. Provisions therein are made for custody of the children and visitation rights of the respondent. Thereby the order appealed from became moot. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term modifying an order pertaining to visitation.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order modifying a provision in a prior interlocutory order fixing alimony pendente lite and granting defendant husband limited rights to visit the children of the marriage. On the day the appeal was argued by appellant the trial court handed down a decision following trial of the separation action. Provisions therein are made for custody of the children and visitation rights of the respondent. Thereby the order appealed from became moot. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term modifying an order pertaining to visitation.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 581, 240 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krzos-v-krzos-nyappdiv-1963.