Krzal v. Sobkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krzal v. Sobkowski

260 A.D. 994, 25 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5727

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 20, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 994 (Krzal v. Sobkowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krzal v. Sobkowski, 260 A.D. 994, 25 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, and for damages for loss of services and medical attendance sustained by plaintiff’s father, by reason of plaintiff being struck by a sky-rocket on a sidewalk on a public street in the city of Dunkirk. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, and for damages for loss of services and medical attendance sustained by plaintiff’s father, by reason of plaintiff being struck by a sky-rocket on a sidewalk on a public street in the city of Dunkirk. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 994, 25 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krzal-v-sobkowski-nyappdiv-1940.