Krzal v. Sobkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krzal v. Sobkowski

260 A.D. 994, 25 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5727

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1940·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, and for damages for loss of services and medical attendance sustained by plaintiff’s father, by reason of plaintiff being struck by a sky-rocket on a sidewalk on a public street in the city of Dunkirk. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, and for damages for loss of services and medical attendance sustained by plaintiff’s father, by reason of plaintiff being struck by a sky-rocket on a sidewalk on a public street in the city of Dunkirk. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.

Krzal v. Sobkowski, 260 A.D. 994, 25 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 994 (Krzal v. Sobkowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.