Kryzan v. New York State Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kryzan v. New York State Board of Elections

55 A.D.3d 1133, 865 N.Y.S.2d 580

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 29, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.3d 1133 (Kryzan v. New York State Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kryzan v. New York State Board of Elections, 55 A.D.3d 1133, 865 N.Y.S.2d 580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

(1) Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (O’Connor, J.), dated October 27, 2008 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, granted the motion of respondent Christopher J. Lee to dismiss the petition, and (2) motion by respondent Christopher J. Lee to dismiss the appeal.

Because the order dated October 27, 2008 and being appealed has never been entered, the motion by respondent Christopher J. Lee to dismiss this appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice (see Jemzura v Jemzura, 24 AD2d 809 [1965]).

Cardona, PJ., Peters, Spain, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the motion is granted, without costs, and the appeal is dismissed, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

(1) Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (O’Connor, J.), dated October 27, 2008 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, granted the motion of respondent Christopher J. Lee to dismiss the petition, and (2) motion by respondent Christopher J. Lee to dismiss the appeal.

Because the order dated October 27, 2008 and being appealed has never been entered, the motion by respondent Christopher J. Lee to dismiss this appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice (see Jemzura v Jemzura, 24 AD2d 809 [1965]).

Cardona, PJ., Peters, Spain, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the motion is granted, without costs, and the appeal is dismissed, without prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.3d 1133, 865 N.Y.S.2d 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kryzan-v-new-york-state-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack