Krystal Kay Kline v. Matthew Bruce Burton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Krystal Kay Kline v. Matthew Bruce Burton

DecidedDecember 28, 2023

Docket14-23-00284-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Krystal Kay Kline v. Matthew Bruce Burton (Krystal Kay Kline v. Matthew Bruce Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krystal Kay Kline v. Matthew Bruce Burton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss granted, motion for sanctions dismissed, appeal dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed December 28, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00284-CV

KRYSTAL KAY KLINE, Appellant

V.

MATTHEW BRUCE BURTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2023-07927

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a final protective order signed March 31, 2023. On December 13, 2023, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion requests that the court dismiss the appeal and also dismiss appellee’s pending motion for sanctions. The motion was also accompanied by an agreed proposed order that, among other things, requests that each party bear its own costs and fees for this appeal. The motion to dismiss is granted. We dismiss the appeal and appellant’s motion for sanctions.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Hassan, and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss granted, motion for sanctions dismissed, appeal dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed December 28, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00284-CV

KRYSTAL KAY KLINE, Appellant

V.

MATTHEW BRUCE BURTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2023-07927

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a final protective order signed March 31, 2023. On December 13, 2023, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion requests that the court dismiss the appeal and also dismiss appellee’s pending motion for sanctions. The motion was also accompanied by an agreed proposed order that, among other things, requests that each party bear its own costs and fees for this appeal. The motion to dismiss is granted. We dismiss the appeal and appellant’s motion for sanctions.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Hassan, and Wilson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Krystal Kay Kline v. Matthew Bruce Burton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krystal-kay-kline-v-matthew-bruce-burton-texapp-2023.