Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild

E.D. Pennsylvania

Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild

216 F. 198, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1575

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 3, 1914

DocketNo. 1273

StatusPublished

This text of 216 F. 198 (Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild, 216 F. 198, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1575 (E.D. Pa. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case was argued with that of Same Plaintiff against Haussmann & Co., 216 Fed. 196, and a preliminary injunction is awarded herein for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that ease.

Counsel may submit a formal decree to this effect, and a bond to be given by the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000, with sureties. Writ to issue upon the decree and bond as filed being approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case was argued with that of Same Plaintiff against Haussmann & Co., 216 Fed. 196, and a preliminary injunction is awarded herein for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that ease.

Counsel may submit a formal decree to this effect, and a bond to be given by the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000, with sureties. Writ to issue upon the decree and bond as filed being approved by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 F. 198, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kryptok-co-v-rothschild-paed-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack