Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild

E.D. Pennsylvania

Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild

216 F. 198, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1575

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided August 3, 1914·No. No. 1273·Published

Opinion

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case was argued with that of Same Plaintiff against Haussmann & Co., 216 Fed. 196, and a preliminary injunction is awarded herein for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that ease.

Counsel may submit a formal decree to this effect, and a bond to be given by the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000, with sureties. Writ to issue upon the decree and bond as filed being approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This case was argued with that of Same Plaintiff against Haussmann & Co., 216 Fed. 196, and a preliminary injunction is awarded herein for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that ease.

Counsel may submit a formal decree to this effect, and a bond to be given by the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000, with sureties. Writ to issue upon the decree and bond as filed being approved by the court.

Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild, 216 F. 198, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1575 (E.D. Pa. 1914).

Pincite

216 F. 198 (Kryptok Co. v. Rothschild) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related