Kryptok Co. v. Harris
This text of 216 F. 642 (Kryptok Co. v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complainant exploits the patents in *»uit by means of licenses and these suits are against dealers. A suit against manufacturers is soon to be reached for final hearing before Judge Hazel in the Northern district. In it a mass of new proofs have been already taken, which have been submitted to me on this motion, and more are still to be taken. Under these circumstances preliminary injunctions may go, but they will be suspended pending the decision of the cause in the Northern district, provided the defendants give proper security to pay to the complainant any damages or profits which may hereafter be awarded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 F. 642, 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kryptok-co-v-harris-nysd-1914.