Kruvant v. 12-22 WOODLAND AVENUE CORPORATION
This text of 376 A.2d 188 (Kruvant v. 12-22 WOODLAND AVENUE CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PHILIP KRUVANT, CHARLES KRUVANT, BOBCAR CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND NORMAN KRUVANT, CHARLES KRUVANT, TRUSTEES IN DISSOLUTION OF EMPIRE HOLDING CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
12-22 WOODLAND AVENUE CORPORATION T/A SUBURBAN ESSEX RIDING CLUB AND MAYFAIR FARMS HOLDING CORP., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges LORA, CRANE and MICHELS.
Mr. William L. Brach argued the cause on behalf of appellants (Messrs. Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg and Silver, attorneys).
*504 Mr. Sheppard A. Guryan argued the cause on behalf of respondent 12-22 Woodland Avenue Corporation t/a Suburban Essex Riding Club (Messrs. Lasser, Lasser, Sarokin & Hochman, attorneys).
Appeal dismissed by consent as to respondent Mayfair Farms Holding Corp.
PER CURIAM.
Our review of the record has persuaded us that the factual findings of the Law Division judge could reasonably have been reached on the evidence. The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Dwyer in his opinion which is reported at 138 N.J. Super. 1 (Law Div. 1975). See Rova Farms Resort v. Investors Ins. Co., 65 N.J. 474, 483-484 (1974); Mannillo v. Gorski, 54 N.J. 378 (1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
376 A.2d 188, 150 N.J. Super. 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kruvant-v-12-22-woodland-avenue-corporation-njsuperctappdiv-1977.