Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Krusoczky v. State

Krusoczky v. State

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Krusoczky v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 844 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1923·No. No. 17896·Published

Opinion

DAY, J.

1. In a prosecution under Sections 6212-15 and 6212-16, General Code, for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, it is not necessary to aver that the same was possessed for beverage purposes, or as a beverage.

2. Sections 6212-15 and 6212-16, General Code, are not in contravention of the Eighteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, nor Section 9 of Article XV of the Constitution of the State of Ohio.

Judgment affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krusoczky v. State, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499 (Ohio 1923).

1 Ohio Law. Abs. 499 (Krusoczky v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.