KRUSCHKE v. Lovell

722 N.W.2d 436, 477 Mich. 895
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in KRUSCHKE v. Lovell. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1112
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 25, 2006·No. 130030·Published

Opinion

722 N.W.2d 436 (2006)

Carol KRUSCHKE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James R. LOVELL, M.D., and James R. Lovell, M.D., P.C., Defendants-Appellants, and
Marquette General Hospital, Defendant.

Docket No. 130030. COA No. 259601.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 25, 2006.

On October 18, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to appeal the November 3, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CORRIGAN, J., would reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUSCHKE v. Lovell, 722 N.W.2d 436, 477 Mich. 895 (Mich. 2006).

722 N.W.2d 436 (KRUSCHKE v. Lovell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.