Krupp v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Krupp v. State

341 S.W.3d 218, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 678, 2011 WL 1874865

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 2011

DocketED 95023

StatusPublished

This text of 341 S.W.3d 218 (Krupp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krupp v. State, 341 S.W.3d 218, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 678, 2011 WL 1874865 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lester Krupp, Jr. (Krupp) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Colleen Dolan, presiding. A jury convicted Krupp of one count of Felonious Restraint, Section 565.120 1 ; four counts of Deviate Sexual Assault, Section 566.070; and one count of Sexual Misconduct, Section 566.090; based on his actions against two women. Krupp pleaded guilty to one count of Felonious Restraint, Section 565.120; and one count of second-degree Domestic Assault, Section 565.073; relating to crimes against a third woman. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the court sentenced Krupp to a total of fifteen years on all counts. This Court dismissed Krupp’s direct appeal based upon Krupp’s waiver of appeal in circuit court. State of Missouri v. Krupp, Jr., ED92150 (Mo.App.E.D.2009). Krupp then filed a motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel regarding his guilty pleas.

On appeal, Krupp argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because his plea counsel was ineffective for assuring him he would serve no more than fifteen percent of his fifteen year sentence. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2006) unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Lester Krupp, Jr. (Krupp) appeals the Judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, the Honorable Colleen Dolan, presiding. A jury convicted Krupp of one count of Felonious Restraint, Section 565.120 1 ; four counts of Deviate Sexual Assault, Section 566.070; and one count of Sexual Misconduct, Section 566.090; based on his actions against two women. Krupp pleaded guilty to one count of Felonious Restraint, Section 565.120; and one count of second-degree Domestic Assault, Section 565.073; relating to crimes against a third woman. Pursuant to a plea agreement, the court sentenced Krupp to a total of fifteen years on all counts. This Court dismissed Krupp’s direct appeal based upon Krupp’s waiver of appeal in circuit court. State of Missouri v. Krupp, Jr., ED92150 (Mo.App.E.D.2009). Krupp then filed a motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel regarding his guilty pleas.

On appeal, Krupp argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing because his plea counsel was ineffective for assuring him he would serve no more than fifteen percent of his fifteen year sentence. We have reviewed the briefs and the Record on Appeal, and find no error of law in this case. Thus, a written opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

AFFIRMED.

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2006) unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

341 S.W.3d 218, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 678, 2011 WL 1874865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krupp-v-state-moctapp-2011.