Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US)

Fourth Circuit

Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US)

671 F. App'x 184

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2016·No. No. 16-1980·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lisa A. Krupczak appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss hér civil action and denying leave to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US), No. 1:16-cv-00023-WMN (D. Md. July 27, 2016). We deny Krupczak’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lisa A. Krupczak appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss hér civil action and denying leave to amend her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US), No. 1:16-cv-00023-WMN (D. Md. July 27, 2016). We deny Krupczak’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US), 671 F. App'x 184 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 184 (Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.