Krupa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Krupa v. State

775 S.W.2d 644, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 73, 1989 WL 39607

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 26, 1989

DocketNo. 757-88

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 775 S.W.2d 644 (Krupa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krupa v. State, 775 S.W.2d 644, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 73, 1989 WL 39607 (Tex. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted by a jury for criminal mischief and assessed 5 years imprisonment. The conviction was affirmed. Krupa v. State, 750 S.W.2d 258 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1988). Appellant filed a petition for discretionary review raising three grounds for review.

We have considered the issues raised and find that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result. As is true in every case where this Court refuses a petition for discretionary review, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. See Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983).

With this understanding, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is refused.

[645]*645TEAGUE, J., would grant, and MILLER, J., would grant grounds 2 and 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI