Krum v. Stoll
2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 287
This text of 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 287 (Krum v. Stoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Cuyahoga Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Krum v. Stoll, 2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 287 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1888).
Opinion
Where a new trial is sought on the ground of newly discovered evidence, that evidence should not be cumulative. Jones v. Voorhees, 10 O., 147; W., 548; Stevens v. Hey, 15 O., 313; 1 D., 115; Loeffner v. State, 10 O. S., 598.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Respublica v. De Longchamps
1 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1784)
State v. Powers
10 Or. 145 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1882)
Ford v. Umatilla County
16 P. 33 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1887)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Ohio Cir. Dec. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krum-v-stoll-ohcirctcuyahoga-1888.