Kruize v. Kruize
This text of 155 A.D.2d 517 (Kruize v. Kruize) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Delaney, J.), entered November 29, 1988, which denied his motion to compel the plaintiff wife to answer certain questions propounded at an examination before trial.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs (see, Roberts v Módica, 102 AD2d 886; Hughson v St. Francis Hosp., 93 AD2d 491). Brown, J. P., Lawrence, Eiber and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 A.D.2d 517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kruize-v-kruize-nyappdiv-1989.