Krug's Estate
This text of 46 A. 484 (Krug's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question in controversy in this case was eminently a question of fact, to wit: whether an antenuptial parol agreement was made betweén the testatrix and her husband in reference to their separate estates. The testimony was all in parol and the auditor was of opinion that it was not sufficiently clear and convincing to satisfy his mind as to the fact of its having been made. The learned court below was of a different opinion and held that the evidence was sufficient to establish the contract and a decree to that effect was accordingly made. After a careful consideration of the testimony we agree with the court and not with the auditor. The opinion sets forth fully the views of the court upon the testimony and the legal conclusions which follow and we affirm the decree thereon.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 A. 484, 196 Pa. 484, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krugs-estate-pa-1900.