Kruger v. Ciadella

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kruger v. Ciadella

11 A.D.2d 1093, 206 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.2d 1093 (Kruger v. Ciadella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kruger v. Ciadella, 11 A.D.2d 1093, 206 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted and appeal dismissed unless typewritten record pursuant to rule V-a of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, and supplemental appendix containing “such relevant portions of any testimony '•* * as are necessary for the consideration of the questions involved” are filed by November 2, 1960. Memorandum: In this case, in which the plaintiffs-appellants are proceeding by the alternative form of record on appeal under rule V-a, it appears that proof was taken upon the trial and that the complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiffs’ case for failure to establish a prima facie case. As an appendix to their briefs, plaintiffs should print, in accordance with the rule, all of the testimony which in their judgment establishes the making out of a prima facie case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted and appeal dismissed unless typewritten record pursuant to rule V-a of the Rules of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, and supplemental appendix containing “such relevant portions of any testimony '•* * as are necessary for the consideration of the questions involved” are filed by November 2, 1960. Memorandum: In this case, in which the plaintiffs-appellants are proceeding by the alternative form of record on appeal under rule V-a, it appears that proof was taken upon the trial and that the complaint was dismissed at the close of the plaintiffs’ case for failure to establish a prima facie case. As an appendix to their briefs, plaintiffs should print, in accordance with the rule, all of the testimony which in their judgment establishes the making out of a prima facie case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.2d 1093, 206 N.Y.S.2d 827, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kruger-v-ciadella-nyappdiv-1960.