Kruger v. Board of County Commissioners
52 P.2d 630, 142 Kan. 907, 1935 Kan. LEXIS 75
Opinion
The principal error assigned in this appeal pertains to the order of the trial court in sustaining appellee’s motion' for a new trial, where the court expressed its dissatisfaction with the verdict. In such a situation it was the trial court’s duty to grant a new trial, and the appeal from that ruling presents no substantial question for appellate review — following Klopfenstein v. Traction Co., 109 Kan. 351, 354-355, 198 Pac. 930.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kruger v. Board of County Commissioners, 52 P.2d 630, 142 Kan. 907, 1935 Kan. LEXIS 75 (kan 1935).
52 P.2d 630 (Kruger v. Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abercrombie v. State Highway Commission
340 P.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1959)