Krug v. Farrington
This text of Krug v. Farrington (Krug v. Farrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8076
GREGORY CHARLES KRUG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JO ANN FARRINGTON; ANNIE A. WONG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00658-GBL-JFA)
Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009
Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Charles Krug, Appellant Pro Se
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gregory Charles Krug appeals the district court’s
order transferring his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388
(1971) to the United States District Court for the Middle
District of Tennessee. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Krug v. Farrington, No. 1:08-cv-00658-
GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. July 21, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Krug v. Farrington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krug-v-farrington-ca4-2009.