Krug v. Farrington

307 F. App'x 744
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2009·No. No. 08-8076·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Charles Krug appeals the district court’s order transferring his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Un[745] known Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Krug v. Farrington, No. 1:08-cv-00658-GBL-JFA (E.D.Va. July 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krug v. Farrington, 307 F. App'x 744 (4th Cir. 2009).

307 F. App'x 744 (Krug v. Farrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related