Krug v. Farrington

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2009
Docket08-8076
StatusUnpublished

This text of Krug v. Farrington (Krug v. Farrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krug v. Farrington, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8076

GREGORY CHARLES KRUG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JO ANN FARRINGTON; ANNIE A. WONG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:08-cv-00658-GBL-JFA)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Charles Krug, Appellant Pro Se

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory Charles Krug appeals the district court’s

order transferring his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971) to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Tennessee. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Krug v. Farrington, No. 1:08-cv-00658-

GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. July 21, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Krug v. Farrington, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krug-v-farrington-ca4-2009.