Krueger v. SUELTHAUS

350 S.W.3d 28, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2011 WL 3586505
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 16, 2011
DocketED 95220
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 S.W.3d 28 (Krueger v. SUELTHAUS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krueger v. SUELTHAUS, 350 S.W.3d 28, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2011 WL 3586505 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Krueger appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting John Suel-thaus’s motion to dismiss Krueger’s petition.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burger v. Director of Revenue
350 S.W.3d 28 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 S.W.3d 28, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2011 WL 3586505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krueger-v-suelthaus-moctapp-2011.