Krueger v. SUELTHAUS

350 S.W.3d 28, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2011 WL 3586505
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2011·No. ED 95220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Krueger appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting John Suel-thaus’s motion to dismiss Krueger’s petition.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krueger v. SUELTHAUS, 350 S.W.3d 28, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1075, 2011 WL 3586505 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

350 S.W.3d 28 (Krueger v. SUELTHAUS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burger v. Director of Revenue
350 S.W.3d 28 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)