Krueger v. State
This text of 837 So. 2d 565 (Krueger v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Chad L. Krueger appeals the summary denial of his 3.850 motion in which he alleged that two of his convictions violated the Double Jeopardy clause. The trial court previously entered an order vacating these convictions and sentences but never entered an amended judgment and sentence reflecting the correction. Counts two and four have been stricken. We now direct the trial court to enter an amended judgment and sentence. Accordingly, we affirm and remand for correction of the scrivener’s error. We affirm without comment all other claims.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 So. 2d 565, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1356, 2003 WL 289413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krueger-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.