Krueger v. Nobles

149 So. 801, 112 Fla. 7
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 149 So. 801 (Krueger v. Nobles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krueger v. Nobles, 149 So. 801, 112 Fla. 7 (Fla. 1933).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decrees; it is therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decrees of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed. Grand Lodge K. of P. v. Stroud, 107 Fla. 152, 144 So. 324; Roberts Bros. v. Langford, 99 Fla. 1268; 128 So. 810; Bailey v. Newman, 107 Fla. 194, 144 So. 392.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts Bros. v. Langford
128 So. 810 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Grand Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Stroud
144 So. 324 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Bailey v. Newman
144 So. 392 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 So. 801, 112 Fla. 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krueger-v-nobles-fla-1933.