Krueger v. Krueger
105 N.W. 1135, 127 Wis. 103, 1906 Wisc. LEXIS 146
Opinion
Tbe only questions argued in tbis court are mental competency and tbe legality of execution. These are pure questions of fact, and we find no clear preponderance of evidence against tbe findings tbereon made by tbe trial court. Indeed, not enough to so reasonably justify appellant in expectation of a favorable result upon tbe appeal tbat we should order his costs paid out-of tbe estate. Sucb being the case, we cannot overturn those findings, which fully support the judgment.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krueger v. Krueger, 105 N.W. 1135, 127 Wis. 103, 1906 Wisc. LEXIS 146 (Wis. 1906).
105 N.W. 1135 (Krueger v. Krueger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Opinion No. Oag 46-82, (1982)
71 Op. Att'y Gen. 147 (Wisconsin Attorney General Reports, 1982)
Duel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
2 N.W.2d 871 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1941)
Wisconsin Town Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Calumet County Mutual Fire Insurance
271 N.W. 51 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1937)