Kruegel v. Williams
This text of 185 S.W. 1072 (Kruegel v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sued H. H. Williams, as district clerk of Dallas county, together with the sureties on his official bond, for actual and exemplary damages, because of the refusal of Williams to issue an execution upon a judgment rendered in favor of appellant against Murphy & Bolanz, March 7, 1894. A review of the record shows that the same issues, based upon the same facts, have heretofore been decided adversely to appellant in the cases cited below, where full statements of all the matters presented in this appeal are set out. Por the reasons announced in the eases cited, the judgment herein is affirmed. Kruegel v. Bolanz, 103 S. W. 435; Kruegel v. Jones, 121 S. W. 218; Kruegel v. Rawlins, 121 S. W. 216; Kruegel v. Murphy & Bolanz, 59 Tex. Civ. App. 482, 126 S. W. 680; Kruegel v. Jones, 136 S. W. 835; Kruegel v. Jones, 143 S. W. 989; Kruegel v. Rawlins, 148 S. W. 343; Kruegel v. Murphy & Bolanz, 157 S. W. 1182; Kruegel v. Williams, 153 S. W. 903; Kruegel v. Murphy, 168 S. W. 983.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 S.W. 1072, 1916 Tex. App. LEXIS 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kruegel-v-williams-texapp-1916.