Kruegel v. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n
This text of 218 F. 988 (Kruegel v. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of the record in this case has led us to the conclusion that there was no error in the decree appealed from. In the argument of the case it was made known to the court that the appellees did not object to the appellants having further time to redeem the land described in the judgment of the District Court, the execution of which the bill in the -case sought to have perpetually enjoined. Treating that suggestion as a consent by the appellees to the modification of the decree appealed from, that decree is modified, by allowing appellants 60 days from this date to make the payments which the decree appealed from provided should have the.effect of .preventing the issuance of the execution ordered- to be issued if such payments should not be made within the time allowed therefor by the decree. ■Except as thus modified,, the decree appealed from is affirmed, all costs.to be [989]*989taxed against the appellants, and to be paid within the time herein allowed as a condition to a withholding of the issuance of the writ of execution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 F. 988, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 1613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kruegel-v-standard-savings-loan-assn-ca5-1915.