Krouses v. United States of America
Opinion
Adana Krouses, No. CV-19-00534-TUC-JCH
Plaintiff, ORDER
v.
United States of America, et al.,
Defendants. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Leslie A. Bowman recommending that this Court dismiss this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) and LRCiv 41.1. (Doc. 34.) A review of the record reflects that no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed and the time to file objections has expired. The Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s recommendation is not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED WITHDRAWING the reference to the Magistrate Judge, ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34) in full, and DISMISSING this action. … 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DIRECTING the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Dated this 19th day of April, 2022. ©
9S MH hr-h □ onorable John C. Hinderaker United States District Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krouses v. United States of America (Krouses v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.