Krouse v. Ross
14 F. Cas. 868, 1 Cranch 368
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1806·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
instructed the jury that if the defendant, during his term, brought the old wooden stable, and fixed it on the lot by posts inserted in the ground and leaning against the wall of a house on an adjoining lot, not belonging to the plaintiff, and before the expiration of the term removed the stable, without injury or damage to the soil or to the other buildings of the plaintiff, either by the erecting or continuance or the removal of the stable, it was lawful for him so to do. The plaintiff became nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Krouse v. Ross, 14 F. Cas. 868, 1 Cranch 368 (circtddc 1806).
14 F. Cas. 868 (Krouse v. Ross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haller Sign Works v. Physical Culture Training School
94 N.E. 920 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1911)