Krouse v. Ross
This text of 14 F. Cas. 868 (Krouse v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
instructed the jury that if the defendant, during his term, brought the old wooden stable, and fixed it on the lot by posts inserted in the ground and leaning against the wall of a house on an adjoining lot, not belonging to the plaintiff, and before the expiration of the term removed the stable, without injury or damage to the soil or to the other buildings of the plaintiff, either by the erecting or continuance or the removal of the stable, it was lawful for him so to do. The plaintiff became nonsuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F. Cas. 868, 1 Cranch 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krouse-v-ross-circtddc-1806.