Krouse v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

149 S.E. 853, 197 N.C. 541, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 292
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 9, 1929·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Conceding that the evidence offered by the plaintiff tended to show that defendant was negligent as alleged in the complaint, this evidence also showed that plaintiff contributed to his injuries by his own negligence. There is no error in the judgment dismissing the action as upon nonsuit. Bailey v. R. R., 196 N. C., 515, 146 S. E., 135.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krouse v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 149 S.E. 853, 197 N.C. 541, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 292 (N.C. 1929).

149 S.E. 853 (Krouse v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. . R. R.
172 S.E. 177 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
Young v. Southern Railway Co.
205 N.C. 530 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)