Krouse v. Deblois

District of Columbia

Krouse v. Deblois

1 D.C. 138

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 15, 1803

StatusPublished

This text of 1 D.C. 138 (Krouse v. Deblois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krouse v. Deblois, 1 D.C. 138 (D.D.C. 1803).

Pincite

Opinion

But the Couet,

(Marshall, J., absent,)

refused to give the instruction; The authorities cited, were: Esp. N. P. 130, 138, 140 ; Rolleston v. Hibbert, 3 T. R. 412; Cates v. Knight, 3 T. R. 444; Cutler v. Powell, 6 T. R. 320; Payne v. Bacom, Doug. 651; Robinson v. Bland, 2 Burr. 1098; Precedents of Declarations, (Boston, June, 1802,) p. 18 and 19.

Mr. Mason prayed leave to amend, which was granted, on payment of costs and a continuance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

But the Couet,

(Marshall, J., absent,)

refused to give the instruction; The authorities cited, were: Esp. N. P. 130, 138, 140 ; Rolleston v. Hibbert, 3 T. R. 412; Cates v. Knight, 3 T. R. 444; Cutler v. Powell, 6 T. R. 320; Payne v. Bacom, Doug. 651; Robinson v. Bland, 2 Burr. 1098; Precedents of Declarations, (Boston, June, 1802,) p. 18 and 19.

Mr. Mason prayed leave to amend, which was granted, on payment of costs and a continuance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 D.C. 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krouse-v-deblois-dcd-1803.