Krouse v. Deblois

14 F. Cas. 867, 1 Cranch 138

This text of 14 F. Cas. 867 (Krouse v. Deblois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Krouse v. Deblois, 14 F. Cas. 867, 1 Cranch 138 (circtddc 1803).

Opinion

But

THE COURT

(MARSHALL, Circuit Judge, absent)

refused to give the instruction. The authorities cited were: Esp. N. P. 130, 138, 140; Rolleston v. Hibbert, 3 Term R. 412; Cates v. Knight, Id. 444; Cutter v. Powell, 6 Term R. 320; Payne v. Bacomb, Doug. 651; Robinson v. Bland, 2 Burrows, 1088; Precedents of Declarations (Boston, June, 1802) pp. 18, 10.

Mr. Mason prayed leave to amend, which was granted, on payment of costs and a continuance.

[The ease, was subsequently tried, and a verdict had for the defendant. Case No. 7,938.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F. Cas. 867, 1 Cranch 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krouse-v-deblois-circtddc-1803.