Krouse v. Deblois
This text of 14 F. Cas. 867 (Krouse v. Deblois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But
refused to give the instruction. The authorities cited were: Esp. N. P. 130, 138, 140; Rolleston v. Hibbert, 3 Term R. 412; Cates v. Knight, Id. 444; Cutter v. Powell, 6 Term R. 320; Payne v. Bacomb, Doug. 651; Robinson v. Bland, 2 Burrows, 1088; Precedents of Declarations (Boston, June, 1802) pp. 18, 10.
Mr. Mason prayed leave to amend, which was granted, on payment of costs and a continuance.
[The ease, was subsequently tried, and a verdict had for the defendant. Case No. 7,938.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 F. Cas. 867, 1 Cranch 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krouse-v-deblois-circtddc-1803.