Krott v. McLaughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Krott v. McLaughlin

235 A.D. 893

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 893 (Krott v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krott v. McLaughlin, 235 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

As to the plaintiff Walter J. Krott the judgment is affirmed, with costs. As to the plaintiffs Pierce J. Krott and Arma, Krott the judgment is reversed on the facts and a new trial is granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless said plaintiffs respectively shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the respective verdicts to the sum of $3,500 in the case of Anna Krott, and the sum of $750 in the case of Pierce J. Krott, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As to the plaintiff Walter J. Krott the judgment is affirmed, with costs. As to the plaintiffs Pierce J. Krott and Arma, Krott the judgment is reversed on the facts and a new trial is granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless said plaintiffs respectively shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the respective verdicts to the sum of $3,500 in the case of Anna Krott, and the sum of $750 in the case of Pierce J. Krott, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and as so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krott-v-mclaughlin-nyappdiv-1932.