Kropp v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kropp v. Incorporated Village of Freeport

277 A.D.2d 289, 715 N.Y.S.2d 667, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11717

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 13, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 A.D.2d 289 (Kropp v. Incorporated Village of Freeport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kropp v. Incorporated Village of Freeport, 277 A.D.2d 289, 715 N.Y.S.2d 667, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11717 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Se-gal, J.), entered November 19, 1999, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs causes of action sounding in breach of contract.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the plaintiffs causes of action sounding in breach of contract is granted, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety.

The Supreme Court erred in failing to dismiss the causes of action sounding in breach of contract. The plaintiff failed to [290]*290exhaust his administrative remedies since he did not first seek review by the Nassau County Civil Service Commission (see, Matter of Plummer v Klepak, 48 NY2d 486, cert denied 445 US 952; Matter of Ray v New York City Dept. of Correction, 212 AD2d 387). Pursuant to section 28 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, the plaintiffs claims should have been addressed first at the administrative level (see, Matter of Levine v Board of Educ., 173 AD2d 619; Matter of Rissinger v State Univ. of N. Y., 199 AD2d 745). Thompson, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a collective bargaining agreement, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Se-gal, J.), entered November 19, 1999, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs causes of action sounding in breach of contract.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to dismiss the plaintiffs causes of action sounding in breach of contract is granted, and the complaint is dismissed in its entirety.

The Supreme Court erred in failing to dismiss the causes of action sounding in breach of contract. The plaintiff failed to [290]*290exhaust his administrative remedies since he did not first seek review by the Nassau County Civil Service Commission (see, Matter of Plummer v Klepak, 48 NY2d 486, cert denied 445 US 952; Matter of Ray v New York City Dept. of Correction, 212 AD2d 387). Pursuant to section 28 of the parties’ collective bargaining agreement, the plaintiffs claims should have been addressed first at the administrative level (see, Matter of Levine v Board of Educ., 173 AD2d 619; Matter of Rissinger v State Univ. of N. Y., 199 AD2d 745). Thompson, J. P., Luciano, Feuerstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 289, 715 N.Y.S.2d 667, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kropp-v-incorporated-village-of-freeport-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack