Kronstat v. Associated Hospital Service
This text of 191 Misc. 619 (Kronstat v. Associated Hospital Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for an order striking out the answer and for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff is denied.
Cross motion for summary judgment in favor of defendant is granted. The plaintiff has pleaded the written contract For the plaintiff to recover, he must show that he was admitted to a hospital as a registered bed patient. From the proof oil the original motion aiid the proof on this cross motion, it appears definitely that he was not a registered bed patient of a hospital within the contract pleaded. Other issues raised are not necessary to determine this motion. Since plaintiff cannot, under the special facts and circumstances pleaded, sustain the burden of proof. on this main issue, the complaint must be dismissed and judgment under the rule accordingly for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 Misc. 619, 78 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronstat-v-associated-hospital-service-nynyccityct-1948.