Kronstadt v. Ray

Supreme Court of Georgia

Kronstadt v. Ray

39 S.E.2d 664, 201 Ga. 312, 1946 Ga. LEXIS 461

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 7, 1946

Docket15535.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 39 S.E.2d 664 (Kronstadt v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kronstadt v. Ray, 39 S.E.2d 664, 201 Ga. 312, 1946 Ga. LEXIS 461 (Ga. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Justice.

An administrator filed a suit in equity to set aside a judgment of a court of ordinary awarding a year’s support to H as widow of the plaintiff’s intestate, and to cancel a deed made by H to R conveying a part of the property, and another deed made by R to K; all of the persons thus designated having been made parties defendant. Separate demurrers were filed by the defendants. The court, by orders passed in October, 1945, overruled the general demurrer of H, but sustained the general demurrers of R and K. On November 2, 1945, the plaintiff administrator filed exceptions pendente lite, complaining of the orders sustaining the demurrers and dismissing the case as to R and K. The case proceeded to trial only as between the administrator and H, and resulted in a verdict and decree in favor of the administrator on April 19, 1946. The administrator, on May 7, 1946, presented a bill of exceptions assigning error only upon Ms exceptions pendente lite, taken on November 2, 1945, to the orders sustaining the demurrers of R and K, and also assigning error upon such orders. A motion to dismiss the writ of error was made by R, upon the ground that there was no proper or timely exception to the orders sustaining such demurrers, or to any final judgment. K filed a similar motion to dismiss. Held, that the motions to dismiss are meritorious, and must be sustained. Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 (79 S. E. 841); Winder Lumber Co. v. Washington Brick Co., 149 Ga. 215 (99 S. E. 863) ; Huson v. Bank of Covington, 158 Ga. 434 (1) (123 S. E. 742); Rabhan v. Rabhan, *313 185 Ga. 355 (195 S. E. 193) ; Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National Bank, 198 Ga. 591 (1) (32 S. E. 2d, 465) ; Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 (35 S. E. 2d, 149); Hicks v. Community Loan & Investment Co., 62 Ga. App. 909 (10 S. E. 2d, 226).

No. 15535. September 7, 1946. Emanuel Kronstadt, in propria persona. Stephens & Gignilliat, Marvin ONeal, and Edwin J. Feiler, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Justice.

An administrator filed a suit in equity to set aside a judgment of a court of ordinary awarding a year’s support to H as widow of the plaintiff’s intestate, and to cancel a deed made by H to R conveying a part of the property, and another deed made by R to K; all of the persons thus designated having been made parties defendant. Separate demurrers were filed by the defendants. The court, by orders passed in October, 1945, overruled the general demurrer of H, but sustained the general demurrers of R and K. On November 2, 1945, the plaintiff administrator filed exceptions pendente lite, complaining of the orders sustaining the demurrers and dismissing the case as to R and K. The case proceeded to trial only as between the administrator and H, and resulted in a verdict and decree in favor of the administrator on April 19, 1946. The administrator, on May 7, 1946, presented a bill of exceptions assigning error only upon Ms exceptions pendente lite, taken on November 2, 1945, to the orders sustaining the demurrers of R and K, and also assigning error upon such orders. A motion to dismiss the writ of error was made by R, upon the ground that there was no proper or timely exception to the orders sustaining such demurrers, or to any final judgment. K filed a similar motion to dismiss. Held, that the motions to dismiss are meritorious, and must be sustained. Durrence v. Waters, 140 Ga. 762 (79 S. E. 841); Winder Lumber Co. v. Washington Brick Co., 149 Ga. 215 (99 S. E. 863) ; Huson v. Bank of Covington, 158 Ga. 434 (1) (123 S. E. 742); Rabhan v. Rabhan, *313 185 Ga. 355 (195 S. E. 193) ; Georgia Veneer & Package Co. v. Florida National Bank, 198 Ga. 591 (1) (32 S. E. 2d, 465) ; Smith v. Barksdale, 199 Ga. 723 (35 S. E. 2d, 149); Hicks v. Community Loan & Investment Co., 62 Ga. App. 909 (10 S. E. 2d, 226).

No. 15535. September 7, 1946. Emanuel Kronstadt, in propria persona. Stephens & Gignilliat, Marvin ONeal, and Edwin J. Feiler, for defendants.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 S.E.2d 664, 201 Ga. 312, 1946 Ga. LEXIS 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronstadt-v-ray-ga-1946.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack