Kronsberg v. Mayer
This text of 15 N.Y.S. 328 (Kronsberg v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It seems that this action was. upon the day calendar, and both sides ready, when it was discontinued by consent, upon defendant’s stipulating to pay taxable costs. It appears that the case was -not actually reached in its regular order. It had been called and passed, and could not, therefore, be moved for trial. Ho trial fee is therefore recoverable. Sutphen v. Lash, 10 Hun, 120; Ehlers v. Willis, 63 How. Pr. 341, are in point, but not Jones v. Case, 38 How. Pr. 349. The taxation is reversed as to the trial fee, and the motion to strike it out granted, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.Y.S. 328, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3614, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronsberg-v-mayer-superctny-1890.