Kronman v. Norsworthy

Supreme Court of Florida

Kronman v. Norsworthy

618 So. 2d 186, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1993 WL 166317

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 20, 1993

DocketNo. 80061

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 618 So. 2d 186 (Kronman v. Norsworthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kronman v. Norsworthy, 618 So. 2d 186, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1993 WL 166317 (Fla. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIMES, Justice.

We review Norsworthy v. Holmes Regional Medical Center Inc., 598 So.2d 105 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), because of its conflict with Tanner v. Hartog, 593 So.2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(8) of the Florida Constitution.

In Tanner v. Hartog, 618 So.2d 177 (Fla.1993), we recently quashed a portion of the Tanner case which dealt with the issue involved in the instant case. When the interpretation we placed upon the medical malpractice statute of limitations in Tanner is applied to the facts of the instant case, it is evident that the court below correctly reversed the summary judgment entered against the Norsworthys. Therefore, we approve the result of the decision below.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI