Kronman v. Norsworthy

618 So. 2d 186, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1993 WL 166317
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 20, 1993·No. No. 80061·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

GRIMES, Justice.

We review Norsworthy v. Holmes Regional Medical Center Inc., 598 So.2d 105 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992), because of its conflict with Tanner v. Hartog, 593 So.2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(8) of the Florida Constitution.

In Tanner v. Hartog, 618 So.2d 177 (Fla.1993), we recently quashed a portion of the Tanner case which dealt with the issue involved in the instant case. When the interpretation we placed upon the medical malpractice statute of limitations in Tanner is applied to the facts of the instant case, it is evident that the court below correctly reversed the summary judgment entered against the Norsworthys. Therefore, we approve the result of the decision below.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, SHAW, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kronman v. Norsworthy, 618 So. 2d 186, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 305, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 909, 1993 WL 166317 (Fla. 1993).

618 So. 2d 186 (Kronman v. Norsworthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
778 So. 2d 932 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Walls v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.
832 F. Supp. 1467 (M.D. Florida, 1993)