Kronfeld v. Kronfeld
809 So. 2d 85, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2040, 2002 WL 269238
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2002·No. Nos. 3D00-3620, 3D00-3362·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the Order on Remand and the Second Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. The trial court properly gave “the husband credit for the money spent in paying off the corporate debt,” in keeping with this court’s mandate in Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 761 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Contrary to the wife’s argument here, the trial court’s distribution properly awards each spouse 50% of the marital assets and then deducts the husband’s credit from the wife’s share.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 809 So. 2d 85, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2040, 2002 WL 269238 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
809 So. 2d 85 (Kronfeld v. Kronfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farrer v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.
809 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)