Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kronfeld v. Kronfeld

Kronfeld v. Kronfeld

809 So. 2d 85, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2040, 2002 WL 269238
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2002
DocketNos. 3D00-3620, 3D00-3362
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 809 So. 2d 85 (Kronfeld v. Kronfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 809 So. 2d 85, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2040, 2002 WL 269238 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Order on Remand and the Second Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. The trial court properly gave “the husband credit for the money spent in paying off the corporate debt,” in keeping with this court’s mandate in Kronfeld v. Kronfeld, 761 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Contrary to the wife’s argument here, the trial court’s distribution properly awards each spouse 50% of the marital assets and then deducts the husband’s credit from the wife’s share.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrer v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.
809 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
809 So. 2d 85, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2040, 2002 WL 269238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronfeld-v-kronfeld-fladistctapp-2002.