Kroner v. Isensee

275 P. 1119, 129 Or. 10, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 97

Opinion

PER CURIAM’.

The court, having heard the argument and discussed the reasons advanced by appellant for reversing this case, are of the opinion that none of the questions discussed and urged by appellant, who is defendant, is meritorious. The case presents no new principle of law. It was fairly tried below and the court’s instructions were fair to defendant. For these reasons the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed. ’ Affirmed.