Kroner v. Isensee

Oregon Supreme Court

Kroner v. Isensee

275 P. 1119, 129 Or. 10, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 97

DecidedMarch 28, 1929

StatusPublished

This text of 275 P. 1119 (Kroner v. Isensee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kroner v. Isensee, 275 P. 1119, 129 Or. 10, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 97 (Or. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM’.

The court, having heard the argument and discussed the reasons advanced by appellant for reversing this case, are of the opinion that none of the questions discussed and urged by appellant, who is defendant, is meritorious. The case presents no new principle of law. It was fairly tried below and the court’s instructions were fair to defendant. For these reasons the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed. ’ Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM’.

The court, having heard the argument and discussed the reasons advanced by appellant for reversing this case, are of the opinion that none of the questions discussed and urged by appellant, who is defendant, is meritorious. The case presents no new principle of law. It was fairly tried below and the court’s instructions were fair to defendant. For these reasons the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed. ’ Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 P. 1119, 129 Or. 10, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kroner-v-isensee-or-1929.