Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co.

4 A.D.2d 936, 167 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064

This text of 4 A.D.2d 936 (Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co., 4 A.D.2d 936, 167 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

Order and judgment appealed from are unanimously affirmed, on the law, with costs to defendants-respondents against plaintiff-appellant. Leave is granted, however, to plaintiff to appeal to the Court of Appeals. We are constrained, as was Special Term, to affirm the dismissal [937]*937of the complaint in this action by a wife for loss of consortium resulting from injury inflicted on her husband through the alleged negligence of defendants. (See Prosser on Torts [2d ed.], p. 703 et seq.) Concur —Peck, P. J., Breitel, Frank, Valente and Bastow, JJ. [5 Misc 2d 961.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co.
5 Misc. 2d 961 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.D.2d 936, 167 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronenbitter-v-washburn-wire-co-nyappdiv-1957.