Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co.

4 A.D.2d 936, 167 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064

Opinion

Order and judgment appealed from are unanimously affirmed, on the law, with costs to defendants-respondents against plaintiff-appellant. Leave is granted, however, to plaintiff to appeal to the Court of Appeals. We are constrained, as was Special Term, to affirm the dismissal [937]*937of the complaint in this action by a wife for loss of consortium resulting from injury inflicted on her husband through the alleged negligence of defendants. (See Prosser on Torts [2d ed.], p. 703 et seq.) Concur —Peck, P. J., Breitel, Frank, Valente and Bastow, JJ. [5 Misc 2d 961.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co., 4 A.D.2d 936, 167 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

4 A.D.2d 936 (Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kronenbitter v. Washburn Wire Co.
5 Misc. 2d 961 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)