Kronenberg v. Sullivan County Steam Laundry Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kronenberg v. Sullivan County Steam Laundry Co.

277 A.D.2d 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 916 (Kronenberg v. Sullivan County Steam Laundry Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kronenberg v. Sullivan County Steam Laundry Co., 277 A.D.2d 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants have appealed from an order of the Albany Special Term of the Supreme Court granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction and denying the cross motion of defendants Sullivan County Steam Laundry Company, Inc., and Meyer Kaplan to dismiss the first and second causes of action set forth in the complaint and also determining that whether or not plaintiffs are entitled to a declaratory judgment shall await the trial of the action. Defendant Okun has also appealed an order of the Albany Spéeial Term of the Supreme Court denying his motion to;dismiss the complaint pursuant to rules 106 and 107 of the Civil Practice Act. For [917]*917the facts in this case see opinion of Mr. Justice Murray (91 N. Y. S. 2d 144). Orders appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Present — Heffernan, J. P., Brewster, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 726.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants have appealed from an order of the Albany Special Term of the Supreme Court granting plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary injunction and denying the cross motion of defendants Sullivan County Steam Laundry Company, Inc., and Meyer Kaplan to dismiss the first and second causes of action set forth in the complaint and also determining that whether or not plaintiffs are entitled to a declaratory judgment shall await the trial of the action. Defendant Okun has also appealed an order of the Albany Spéeial Term of the Supreme Court denying his motion to;dismiss the complaint pursuant to rules 106 and 107 of the Civil Practice Act. For [917]*917the facts in this case see opinion of Mr. Justice Murray (91 N. Y. S. 2d 144). Orders appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. Present — Heffernan, J. P., Brewster, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ. [See 278 App. Div. 726.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronenberg-v-sullivan-county-steam-laundry-co-nyappdiv-1950.