Kronemeyer v. Frohne

180 Misc. 729, 43 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2107

This text of 180 Misc. 729 (Kronemeyer v. Frohne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kronemeyer v. Frohne, 180 Misc. 729, 43 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The Trial Judge committed reversible error in refusing to allow defendant to introduce evidence of prior custom to explain the terms of ambiguous sections of the constitution and by-laws of the defendant association.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

Hammer, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 Misc. 729, 43 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1943 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronemeyer-v-frohne-nyappterm-1943.