Kroncke v. Arizona
This text of 171 F. App'x 544 (Kroncke v. Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[545]*545MEMORANDUM
Appellant’s motion to correct the caption is granted. Accordingly, the Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect the above-corrected caption.
A review of the record, the opening brief, and appellant’s response to the November 23, 2005 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 F. App'x 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kroncke-v-arizona-ca9-2006.