Kromer v. Ozab

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Kromer v. Ozab

84 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1132 (Kromer v. Ozab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kromer v. Ozab, 84 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

BLANCHARD, J.

The opinion of the justice before whom this action was tried contains .an admirable discussion of the facts of the case and of the principles of law applicable thereto. His conclusions' that the defendants Retman were bona fide purchasers for value from defendants Ozab and Muller, and had no notice that the sale to Ozab and Muller by the plaintiffs was a conditional sale, are correct. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLANCHARD, J.

The opinion of the justice before whom this action was tried contains .an admirable discussion of the facts of the case and of the principles of law applicable thereto. His conclusions' that the defendants Retman were bona fide purchasers for value from defendants Ozab and Muller, and had no notice that the sale to Ozab and Muller by the plaintiffs was a conditional sale, are correct. The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kromer-v-ozab-nyappterm-1903.