Kromer v. Kear

Ohio Court of Appeals

Kromer v. Kear

90 N.E.2d 422, 86 Ohio App. 309, 55 Ohio Law. Abs. 385, 41 Ohio Op. 350, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 649

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 8, 1949

Docket4318

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 90 N.E.2d 422 (Kromer v. Kear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kromer v. Kear, 90 N.E.2d 422, 86 Ohio App. 309, 55 Ohio Law. Abs. 385, 41 Ohio Op. 350, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 649 (Ohio Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinions

This cause is submitted on motion by the plaintiff-appellee for an order dismissing the appeal on the following grounds:

1. The appeal is noted as one on questions of law and fact and the same is not in a chancery case.

2. That no notice of appeal was filed within 20 days after the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County.

The record discloses that the action is one in forcible entry and detainer, which is not a chancery case and is, therefore, not appealable on questions of law and fact. See Shafer v. Stein,78 Ohio App. 47, 62 N.E.2d 297.

Now considering the second branch of the motion, the appellant would be permitted under Section 11564, General Code, to perfect his appeal on questions of law providing the notice of appeal was filed within the *Page 310 statutory period. The appellee contends that it was not and therefore this court has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The record discloses that the action arose in the Municipal Court of Columbus, and on appeal on questions of law to the Court of Common Pleas the judgment was affirmed on April 30, 1949. On May 5, 1949, a motion for a new trial was filed which was overruled on June 6, 1949. The notice of appeal was filed on June 14, 1949. The question here presented is when the statutory 20-day period begins to run. We are aware of no provision in the Code for the filing of a motion for a new trial in appellate court in a case where the appeal is on questions of law only. Section 11575, General Code, defines a new trial as follows: "A new trial is a re-examination, in the same court, of the issues, after a final order, judgment or decree by the court."

A trial is a formal examination of the matter in issue on a cause before a competent tribunal for the purpose of determining such issue, which may be one on law or fact or both. The trial was, therefore, had in the Municipal Court and Section 11575, General Code, requires that the new trial, if granted, must be in the same court. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the provisions of Section 12223-7, General Code, with reference to the filing of notice of appeal within 20 days after the entry of an order overruling or sustaining a motion for a new trial, means a motion for a new trial in the trial court. Such provisions do not refer to a motion for a new trial in an appellate court, where the appeal is on questions of law only. Since the notice of appeal was not seasonably filed, the motion to dismiss will be sustained.

Motion sustained.

MILLER, P.J., HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ., concur. *Page 311

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is submitted on motion by the plaintiff-appellee for an order dismissing the appeal on the following grounds:

1. The appeal is noted as one on questions of law and fact and the same is not in a chancery case.

2. That no notice of appeal was filed within 20 days after the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County.

The record discloses that the action is one in forcible entry and detainer, which is not a chancery case and is, therefore, not appealable on questions of law and fact. See Shafer v. Stein,78 Ohio App. 47, 62 N.E.2d 297.

Now considering the second branch of the motion, the appellant would be permitted under Section 11564, General Code, to perfect his appeal on questions of law providing the notice of appeal was filed within the *Page 310 statutory period. The appellee contends that it was not and therefore this court has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal. The record discloses that the action arose in the Municipal Court of Columbus, and on appeal on questions of law to the Court of Common Pleas the judgment was affirmed on April 30, 1949. On May 5, 1949, a motion for a new trial was filed which was overruled on June 6, 1949. The notice of appeal was filed on June 14, 1949. The question here presented is when the statutory 20-day period begins to run. We are aware of no provision in the Code for the filing of a motion for a new trial in appellate court in a case where the appeal is on questions of law only. Section 11575, General Code, defines a new trial as follows: "A new trial is a re-examination, in the same court, of the issues, after a final order, judgment or decree by the court."

A trial is a formal examination of the matter in issue on a cause before a competent tribunal for the purpose of determining such issue, which may be one on law or fact or both. The trial was, therefore, had in the Municipal Court and Section 11575, General Code, requires that the new trial, if granted, must be in the same court. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the provisions of Section 12223-7, General Code, with reference to the filing of notice of appeal within 20 days after the entry of an order overruling or sustaining a motion for a new trial, means a motion for a new trial in the trial court. Such provisions do not refer to a motion for a new trial in an appellate court, where the appeal is on questions of law only. Since the notice of appeal was not seasonably filed, the motion to dismiss will be sustained.

Motion sustained.

MILLER, P.J., HORNBECK and WISEMAN, JJ., concur. *Page 311

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.E.2d 422, 86 Ohio App. 309, 55 Ohio Law. Abs. 385, 41 Ohio Op. 350, 1949 Ohio App. LEXIS 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kromer-v-kear-ohioctapp-1949.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack