Kroll v. Steinfeldt-Thompson Co.

190 So. 2d 760
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1966
DocketNo. 34501
StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 2d 760 (Kroll v. Steinfeldt-Thompson Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kroll v. Steinfeldt-Thompson Co., 190 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the District Court of Appeal, 176 So.2d 520, is affirmed on authority of our opinion in Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, 190 So.2d 777.

The writ of certiorari is discharged.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.
190 So. 2d 777 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kroll-v-steinfeldt-thompson-co-fla-1966.