Kroll v. International Terminal Operating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Kroll v. International Terminal Operating Co.

10 A.D.2d 867, 199 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10707

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 867 (Kroll v. International Terminal Operating Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kroll v. International Terminal Operating Co., 10 A.D.2d 867, 199 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is by the International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., defendant and third-party plaintiff, and by the Empire Mutual Insurance Company, third-party defendant, from an order which granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment against appellant International, directed an assessment of damages and the entry of judgment against said appellant, and directed that the third-party action between the two appellants be determined at the same time. Order reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to both appellants, and motion denied. The record presents triable issues of fact which may not be resolved upon a motion for summary judgment. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is by the International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., defendant and third-party plaintiff, and by the Empire Mutual Insurance Company, third-party defendant, from an order which granted respondent’s motion for summary judgment against appellant International, directed an assessment of damages and the entry of judgment against said appellant, and directed that the third-party action between the two appellants be determined at the same time. Order reversed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to both appellants, and motion denied. The record presents triable issues of fact which may not be resolved upon a motion for summary judgment. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 867, 199 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kroll-v-international-terminal-operating-co-nyappdiv-1960.