Kroll Associates, Delaware Corporation v. City and County of Honolulu Russell W. Miyake Frank F. Fasi, and Kevin P.H. Sumida Matsui, Chung & Sumida
This text of 53 F.3d 338 (Kroll Associates, Delaware Corporation v. City and County of Honolulu Russell W. Miyake Frank F. Fasi, and Kevin P.H. Sumida Matsui, Chung & Sumida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 338
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
KROLL ASSOCIATES, Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU; Russell W. Miyake; Frank F.
Fasi, Defendants-Appellants,
and
Kevin P.H. Sumida; Matsui, Chung & Sumida, Appellants.
No. 93-16804.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 27, 1995.
Before: POOLE, BEEZER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
All judges concurring, the Memorandum disposition, filed April 25, 1994, is herewith withdrawn and the appeal is dismissed pursuant to the terms of the signed Agreement for Dismissal of Appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 338, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4086, 1995 WL 80167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kroll-associates-delaware-corporation-v-city-and-c-ca9-1995.